JUDr. Štefan Tomašovský

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Prešov, we register 3,100 hearings and 3,519 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for almost 28 years, bez časového obmedzenia funkcie.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is low.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from business agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from business agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 62.56% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 219 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 321.05% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 381 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 61 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 97. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 119 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 59.66% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 1
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Commercial agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Commercial agenda.

The judge worked 1509 days in the period and was assigned on average 46 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 9 from 40 possible points and ranked on 634 – 638. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 0 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 9 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 30.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66.5%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 23
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 7

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 2.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.5%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.7% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.8%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 425.1 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 396 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 192 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 48.5% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 107.6% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Obchodná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Obchodnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 657 days and on average was assigned 14 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Evidujeme menej ako 10 odvolaní o rozhodnutiach sudcu, preto dáta považujeme za nereprezentatívne.

Efficiency indicators

Pre sudcu evidujeme menej ako 20 rozhodnutí, preto jeho efektivitu nehodnotíme.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2012 – 2
  • 2011 – od 1.9.2011 – zastavený nápad v senáte 22Cb – zvýšený nápad v senátoch: 1R, 1Exre, 1K, 1NcKR, 1NsRe v pomere 2 : 1 k nápadu v ostatnaých senátoch – zvýšený nápad v senáte 1CbR v pomere 2 : 1 : 1 z dôvodu rovnomernej zaťaženosti sudcov
  • 2011 – od 1.9.2011 – zastavený nápad v senáte 22Cb – zvýšený nápad v senátoch: 1R, 1Exre, 1K, 1NcKR, 1NsRe v pomere 2 : 1 k nápadu v ostatnaých senátoch – zvýšený nápad v senáte 1CbR v pomere 2 : 1 : 1 z dôvodu rovnomernej zaťaženosti sudcov
  • 2011 – 2; 2012 – 2
  • 2011 – 2

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie
    Iná povaha rozhodnutia
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 78.493,33 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o vyhlásenie konkurzu Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie zmluvnej pokuty… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie zmluvnej pokuty… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie zmluvnej pokuty… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie zmluvnej pokuty… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o vylúčenie veci zo súpisu… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 19.313,69 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o vyhlásenie konkurzu Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o vyhlásenie konkurzu Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.