JUDr. Zuzana Doricová

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Bratislava I, we register 2,847 hearings and 1,512 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for about 26 years, bez časového obmedzenia funkcie.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 3
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 2

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1512 days in the period and was assigned on average 10 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 13.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 594 – 602. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 9 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 4.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 73.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 201
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 148

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 12.2% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3.2% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 893.4 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 328 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 268 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 81.7% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 122.9% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1098 days in the period and was assigned on average 12 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 15.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 601 – 622. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 9 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 6.5 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 71.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 160
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 115

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 12.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3.5% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 578 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 483 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 257 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 53.2% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 91.9% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 661 days and on average was assigned 114 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 68,6% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 86
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 59

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 11,8% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 3,7%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 446 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 314 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 214 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 56,3% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 91,8% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 16 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 600 – 606. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 7,75 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 8,25 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2012 – nezúčastnila sa
  • 2011 – seminár – 1; 2012 – nezúčastnila sa
  • 2011 – seminár – 1

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Poistenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie – Neplatnosť právnych úkonov
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Odmietajúce podanie
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie – Právo duševného vlastníctva
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, PR - zaplatenie 29 218,45 EUR… Hearing will be held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o náhradu škody na zdraví a… Hearing will be held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Žaloba o ochranu osobnosti Hearing will be held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zaplatenie 496,42 Eur s… Hearing will be held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zaplatenie 11 909,98 € s… Hearing will be held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o určenie neplatnosti… Hearing will be held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, odporovateľnosť právnych… Hearing will be held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, náhradu škody a náhradu… Hearing will be held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, PR zaplatenie 1 464,66 Eur s… Hearing will be held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Návrh na vydanie platobného… Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zaplatenie 3.640,60 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, PR zaplatenie 2.704,24 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, PR - zaplatenie 1 159,25 EUR… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vydanie bezdôvodného… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, ochrana osobnosti Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o náhradu škody 224 142 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, PR zaplatenie 589,07 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, na náhradu škody s prísl. Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zrušenie a vyporiadanie… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, PR - zaplatenie 29 218,45 EUR… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.