JUDr. Michal Mravec

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Žilina, we register 504 hearings and 2,585 judgements.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Okresný súd Čadca, we register 2,538 hearings and 1 judgement.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for almost 12 years.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from criminal agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from criminal agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 64.62% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 212 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 72.79% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 202 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 321 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 337.379. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 228 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 23.68% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 1
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 1

The judge was not assigned to any agenda dominantly. The judge mostly issued judgements in translation missing: en.judges.indicators_2015.basic.decided_agenda.NA.

The judge worked 795 days in the period and was assigned on average 48 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 20.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 369 – 388. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 7.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 13 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 66.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.8%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 101
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 67

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 7.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.4%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.5% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 276.4 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 181 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 82 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 45.3% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 127.8% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 1
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 1

The judge was not assigned to any agenda dominantly. The judge did not issue judgements in any agenda dominantly..

The judge worked 355 days in the period and was assigned on average 41 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 23 from 40 possible points and ranked on 304 – 323. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 9 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 14 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 68.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66.3%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 45
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 31

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.8%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.9% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.9%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 216 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 361 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 82 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 22.7% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 83.3% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Iné práva a slobody
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok – Sloboda a ľudská dôstojnosť – Iné práva…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Život a zdravie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Rodina a mládež
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Trestný rozkaz – Poriadok vo verejných veciach
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Trestný rozkaz – Poriadok vo verejných veciach
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Trestný rozkaz – Život a zdravie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Trestný rozkaz – Život a zdravie – Iné práva…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Trestný rozkaz – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, prečin: zanedbanie… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Žilina
    Judge – JUDr. Michal Mravec
    Defendant – L. Q.
  2. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, prečin ublíženia na… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Žilina
    Judge – JUDr. Michal Mravec
    Defendant – D. Y.
  3. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, obzvlášť závažný… Hearing will be held on

  4. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, prečin: zanedbanie… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Žilina
    Judge – JUDr. Michal Mravec
    Defendant – H. A.
  5. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, obzvlášť závažný… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Žilina
    Judge – JUDr. Michal Mravec
    Defendant – Q. T.
  6. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, prečin: zanedbanie… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Žilina
    Judge – JUDr. Michal Mravec
    Defendant – G. M.
  7. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, prečin výtržníctva-§… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Žilina
    Judge – JUDr. Michal Mravec
    Defendant – O. C.
  8. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, prečin: ohrozenie pod… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Žilina
    Judge – JUDr. Michal Mravec
    Defendant – K. T.
  9. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zločin týrania blíz.… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Žilina
    Judge – JUDr. Michal Mravec
    Defendant – M. Z.
  10. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, žiadosť o povolenie… Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, prečin: zanedbanie… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Žilina
    Judge – JUDr. Michal Mravec
    Defendant – Z. T.
  2. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, prečin krádeže-§ 212/1… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Žilina
    Judge – JUDr. Michal Mravec
    Defendant – W. I.
  3. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, prečin zaned. pov. výž.… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Žilina
    Judge – JUDr. Michal Mravec
    Defendant – Z. S.
  4. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, prečin ublíženia na… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Žilina
    Judge – JUDr. Michal Mravec
    Defendant – U. W.
  5. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, obzvlášť závažný… Hearing was held on

  6. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, prečin neodvedenia… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Žilina
    Judge – JUDr. Michal Mravec
    Defendant – A. F.
  7. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, prečin výtržníctva-§… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Žilina
    Judge – JUDr. Michal Mravec
    Defendant – H. M.
  8. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, prečin: ublíženie na… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Žilina
    Judge – JUDr. Michal Mravec
    Defendant – N. T.
  9. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, obzvlášť závažný… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Žilina
    Judge – JUDr. Michal Mravec
    Defendant – I. B.
  10. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, prečin nebezpečného… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Žilina
    Judge – JUDr. Michal Mravec
    Defendant – Z. X.
More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.