Mgr. Gabriel Frankovič

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Košice II, we register 664 hearings and 501 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for more than 23 years, bez časového obmedzenia funkcie.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2017

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 11
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 1

The judge was mostly assigned to Commercial agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Commercial agenda.

The judge worked 686 days in the period and was assigned on average 70 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 4 from 40 possible points and ranked on 738. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 0 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 4 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 38.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 64.9%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 60
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 23

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.8%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4.9% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 819 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 563 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 428 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 76% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 89% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie – Exekúcia a výkon rozhodnutí
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie – Exekúcia a výkon rozhodnutí
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, 350,23 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, 1.243,14 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, 33 551,03 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, 672,05 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, 38.082,42 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, 18.256,66 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, 851,23 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, 315,17 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, 1.166,49 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, 169,50 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.