JUDr. Anna Irikovská

  1. Inactive judge at the court Okresný súd Považská Bystrica, we register 1,558 hearings and 1,681 judgements.

Indicators for 2021

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 629 days in the period and was assigned on average 23 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 23 from 40 possible points and ranked on 244 – 268. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 9 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 14 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 74.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 166
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 123

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 14.2% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3.7% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 214.6 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 117 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 34 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 29.1% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 105.9% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 215 days in the period and was assigned on average 25 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 31.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 31 – 40. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 13.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 18 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 84.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 64
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 54

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 11.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.8% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 160 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 242 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 59 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 24.4% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 104.3% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie – Exekúcia a výkon rozhodnutí
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie – Exekúcia a výkon rozhodnutí
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Opravné uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie – Exekúcia a výkon rozhodnutí
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie – Exekúcia a výkon rozhodnutí
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie – Exekúcia a výkon rozhodnutí
    Iná povaha rozhodnutia
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie – Exekúcia a výkon rozhodnutí
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie – Exekúcia a výkon rozhodnutí
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie – Exekúcia a výkon rozhodnutí
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, 3271,25 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie neplatnosti uznesenia… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Žaloba o určenie vlastníctva… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zvýšenie výživného a úprava… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zrušenie vecného bremena Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 7.000,- € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 109,38 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 50,89 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, rozvod manželstva Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 29.101,90 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.