JUDr. Jaroslav Ivan

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Senica, we register 702 hearings and 976 judgements.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Okresný súd Piešťany, we register 2,632 hearings and 1 judgement.
  3. Inactive judge at the court Okresný súd Skalica, we register 747 hearings and no judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for about 13 years.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is above average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 77.72% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 193 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 117.00% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 351 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 234 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 225.159. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 196 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 56.12% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 2
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 2

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 485 days in the period and was assigned on average 38 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 22 from 40 possible points and ranked on 345 – 366. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 12 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 10 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 80% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 35
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 28

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 2.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 0.6% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 444 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 689 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 407 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 59.1% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 106.4% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 138 days and on average was assigned 514 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Evidujeme menej ako 10 odvolaní o rozhodnutiach sudcu, preto dáta považujeme za nereprezentatívne.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 1315 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 609 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 315 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 51,5% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 23,8% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Dáta o kvalite a efektivite sudcu nepovažujeme za dostatočné, preto sudcu bodovo nehodnotíme.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – vymenovanie do funkcie sudcu od 13.05.2013
  • 2013 – vymenovanie do funkcie sudcu od 13.05.2013
  • 2013 – 5. – 7.6.2013 – Inštitút Omšenie – porada sudcov – 3 dni 28. – 29.10.2013 – Justičná akadémia Omšenie – "Väzba, zaistenie osôb a majetku v trestnom konaní" – 2 dni 11. – 12.12.2013 – Justičná akadémia Omšenie – "Princípa vnútroštátnej aplikácie práva EÚ" – 2 dni
  • 2013 – 5. – 7.6.2013 – Inštitút Omšenie – porada sudcov – 3 dni 28. – 29.10.2013 – Justičná akadémia Omšenie – "Väzba, zaistenie osôb a majetku v trestnom konaní" – 2 dni 11. – 12.12.2013 – Justičná akadémia Omšenie – "Princípa vnútroštátnej aplikácie práva EÚ" – 2 dni

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Starostlivosť o maloletých – Vyživovacie…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Starostlivosť o maloletých – Vyživovacie…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie – Starostlivosť o maloletých…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Vyživovacie povinnosti – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Vyživovacie povinnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Starostlivosť o maloletých – Vyživovacie…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Návrh na začatie konania o… Hearing will be held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zmena úpravy styku Hearing will be held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zmena úpravy práv a… Hearing will be held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Návrh na výkon súdneho… Hearing will be held on

  5. Vyhlásenie rozsudku, Určenie vlastníckeho práva, NO Hearing will be held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zmena zverenia Hearing will be held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, návrh na rozvod a úprava… Hearing will be held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Zvýšenie výživného Hearing will be held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Úprava práv a povinností k… Hearing will be held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Rozvod a úprava práv a… Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zverenie do pestúnskej… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Výkon rozhodnutia Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zrušenie výživného na plnoleté… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, úprava práv a povinností Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zmena úpravy práv a povinností… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, pozbavenie výkonu rodičovských… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zmena úpravy styku Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Uloženie výchovného opatrenia Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zmena úpravy práv a… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Návrh na začatie konania o… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.