Mgr. Anna Križanová

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Nové Zámky, we register 1,949 hearings and 2,592 judgements.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Commercial agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Commercial agenda.

The judge worked 1475 days in the period and was assigned on average 96 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 23.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 224 – 243. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 7.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 16 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 66.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66.5%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 165
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 109

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 6.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.5%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.3% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.8%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 174 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 144 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 38 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 26.4% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 120.8% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Commercial agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Commercial agenda.

The judge worked 1041 days in the period and was assigned on average 77 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 25 from 40 possible points and ranked on 214 – 237. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 6 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 19 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 61.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 64.9%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 115
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 71

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 6.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.8%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.5% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 141 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 166 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 37 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 22.3% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 103.1% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Obchodná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Obchodnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 625 days and on average was assigned 143 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 65,2% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 63,7%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 66
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 43

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 6,8% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 9,7%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 2,4%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,4%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 52 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 50 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 26 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 27,7% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 114,1% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 29 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 46 – 51. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 8,5 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 20,5 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2012 – 29. 3. – 30. 3. 2012 – Spoločné stretnutie sudcov v rámci obvodu KS Nitra – Omšenie
  • 2012 – 29. 3. – 30. 3. 2012 – Spoločné stretnutie sudcov v rámci obvodu KS Nitra – Omšenie

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok pre uznanie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok pre zmeškanie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok pre zmeškanie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok pre zmeškanie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok pre zmeškanie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, 30.600,- EUR s prísl. Hearing will be held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o vyporiadanie BSM Hearing will be held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o vypratanie nehnuteľnosti Hearing will be held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 140.413,68 EUR s… Hearing will be held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zapretie otcovstva Hearing will be held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 596,48 EUR s… Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 901,21 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 20.630,28 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 3.061,54 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 1.304,42 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 1.850,- EUR s… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, 351.884,- Kč s prísl. Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 660,52 EUR Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 3.840,- EUR s… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, 19.726,- EUR Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 7.954,38 eur s… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.