JUDr. Mária Kubusová

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Poprad, we register 2,708 hearings and 2,058 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for more than 17 years.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 3
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1288 days in the period and was assigned on average 18 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 13.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 594 – 602. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 0 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 13.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 44.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 389
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 174

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 18.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 10.4% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 448.3 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 269 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 222 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 82.5% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 322.1% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 2
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 970 days in the period and was assigned on average 21 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 14.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 639 – 649. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 1.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 13 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 45.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 333
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 152

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 20.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 10.9% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 22 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 22 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 11 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 50% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 74.3% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 211 days and on average was assigned 108 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 42,6% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 61
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 26

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 23,9% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 13,7%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Pre sudcu evidujeme menej ako 20 rozhodnutí, preto jeho efektivitu nehodnotíme.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2011 – Dvojdňový seminár – Kataster nehnuteľností a Občianský zákonník, Omšenie, november 2011.
  • 2011 – Dvojdňový seminár – Kataster nehnuteľností a Občianský zákonník, Omšenie, november 2011.

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Vlastnícke právo k nehnuteľnostiam
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Bezpodielové spoluvlastníctvo manželov
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 892,75 € s… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 4.454,92 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o určenie neplatnosti… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o ochranu osobnosti Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o vrátenie hnuteľných vecí Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zrušenie a vyporiadanie… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 4 265,04 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 2.059,38 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 14.310,- € s… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o vyporiadanie zaniknutého… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.