Close persons acknowledged in property declarations in years 2014, 2013, 2012, and 2011.
Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2014:
Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2013:
Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2012:
Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2011:
Overall evaluation of the judge is low.
No agenda dominated in incoming cases for the judge during 2021. No agenda dominated in judge's decrees during 2021.
We register 70.83% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%.
We register 48 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.
The judge had overal appointment of cases of 95.52% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 362 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 128 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.
Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 120.44. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 110 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 38.18% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.
We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.
We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.
The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.
For the judge we register performance data for years 2011:
Sudcovi neboli v sledovanom období prideľované prípady v hlavných agendách. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.
The judge in this period worked 85 days and on average was assigned 0 cases in 10 days in main agendas.
Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 50% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.
Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 23,5% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.
Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 11,8%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.
Pre sudcu evidujeme menej ako 20 rozhodnutí, preto jeho efektivitu nehodnotíme.
Notes about the data obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.
Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.