JUDr. Jana Scholtzová

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Žilina, we register 3,932 hearings and 1,116 judgements.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 6
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 4

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1392 days in the period and was assigned on average 17 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 19.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 411 – 435. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 7.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 12 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 66.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 313
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 208

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 12.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4.1% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 450.5 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 274 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 206 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 75.2% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 205.6% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 4
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 2

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1017 days in the period and was assigned on average 20 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 20 from 40 possible points and ranked on 444 – 466. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 7.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 12.5 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 67.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 243
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 163

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 12.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4.1% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 395 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 638 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 264 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 41.4% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 102.3% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 2 and delays prior to case assignment 2.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 606 days and on average was assigned 171 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 69,3% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 101
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 70

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 10,9% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 3,3%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 352 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 429 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 236 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 51% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 127,9% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 18,5 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 501 – 508. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 8 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 10,5 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2012 – nebol dôvod na zníženie nápadu
  • 2012 – nebol dôvod na zníženie nápadu
  • 2011 – 5
  • 2011 – 5

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozhodnutie – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozhodnutie – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozhodnutie – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozhodnutie – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozhodnutie – Zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozhodnutie – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie vlastníckeho práva k… Hearing will be held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, náhradu nemajetkovej ujmy Hearing will be held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zrušenie a vyporiadanie… Hearing will be held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, žaloba o určenie vlastníckeho… Hearing will be held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie vlastníckeho práva k… Hearing will be held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, rozšírenie vecného bremena… Hearing will be held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 10346,98 Eur s… Hearing will be held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zaplatenie 987,10 € s prísl. Hearing will be held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 8274,85 Eur s… Hearing will be held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vydanie bezdôvodného… Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, náhradu škody a nemajetkovej… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, N á v r h o vyporiadanie… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, N á v r h na vydanie… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 150 EUR s prísl. Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Žalobapodľa §137 a)… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, NÁVRH NA VYDANIE PLATOBNÉHO… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vyslovenie neplatnosti… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zrušenie a vyporiadanie BSM… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Návrh na vydanie platobného… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 4832,73 EUR s… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.