Mgr. Eva Strašková

  1. Inactive judge at the court Okresný súd Veľký Krtíš, we register 1,707 hearings and 971 judgements.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in translation missing: en.judges.indicators_2015.basic.decided_agenda.trestná.

The judge worked 1286 days in the period and was assigned on average 72 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 19 from 40 possible points and ranked on 436 – 463. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 4.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 14.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 59.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 390
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 233

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 28.2% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.7%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 11.4% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.9%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 198.4 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 50 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 18 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 36% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 100% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Criminal agenda.

The judge worked 992 days in the period and was assigned on average 53 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 23 from 40 possible points and ranked on 304 – 323. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 4.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 18.5 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 58.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 63.8%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 281
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 164

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 25.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 10.8% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 116 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 63 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 28 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 44.4% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 107.6% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Trestná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Trestnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 589 days and on average was assigned 75 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 53,5% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 52,3%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 129
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 69

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 28% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,4%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 13%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 4%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 172 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 66 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 32 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 43,2% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 92,7% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 21,25 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 355 – 369. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 5 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 16,25 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – nápad 4Er zastavený z dôvodu poverenia plnením úloh predsedu súdu od 01. 12. 2013
  • 2013 – nápad 4Er zastavený z dôvodu poverenia plnením úloh predsedu súdu od 01. 12. 2013
  • 2013 – 4 školenia
  • 2012 – 5 školení
  • 2011 – 3 školenia; 2012 – 5 školení; 2013 – 4 školenia
  • 2011 – 3 školenia

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Rodina a mládež
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok – Iné práva a slobody
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti životnému…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Sloboda a ľudská dôstojnosť
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok – Iné práva a slobody
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Sloboda a ľudská dôstojnosť
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Hospodárske trestné činy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, dohoda o vine a treste Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, schválenie dohody o vine a… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, dohoda o vine a treste Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, dohoda o vine a treste Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, schválenie dohody o vine a… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, schválenie odohody o vine a… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, dohoda o vine a treste Hearing was held on

  8. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, P360/1, P360/2 Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Z225/1, Z225/5 Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, P156/1, P364/1 písm.a Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.