JUDr. Marianna Hirková

  1. Active judge at the court Krajský súd Prešov, we register 406 hearings and 77 judgements.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Okresný súd Humenné, we register 1,735 hearings and 1,636 judgements.

Indicators for 2021

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 248 days in the period and was assigned on average 20 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 19.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 411 – 435. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 15 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 4.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 100% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 23
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 23

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 13.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 0% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 412 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 193 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 164 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 85% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 35.2% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2013

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Zrušujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie
    Pripúštajúce spätvzatie návrhu, zrušujúce rozsudok a…
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie – Dedičské právo
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Zrušujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie
    Zmenené
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie – Zodpovednosť za škodu
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie – Záložné právo
    Zrušujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie
    Pripúštajúce spätvzatie návrhu, zrušujúce rozsudok a…
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zriadenie vecného bremena in… Hearing was held on

  2. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o určenie neplatnosti Zmluvy o… Hearing was held on

  3. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, určenie neplatnosti kúpnej… Hearing was held on

  4. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o určenie neplatnosti Zmluvy o… Hearing was held on

  5. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, náhrada škody Hearing was held on

  6. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zaplatenie nemajetkovej ujmy Hearing was held on

  7. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o určenie, že úver je… Hearing was held on

  8. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zriadení vecného bremena in… Hearing was held on

  9. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, určenie neprijateľnosti… Hearing was held on

  10. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, určenie neprijateľnosti zmluv.… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.