JUDr. Andrea Hrneková

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Bratislava I, we register 2,376 hearings and 1,512 judgements.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 4
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 3

The judge was mostly assigned to Commercial agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Commercial agenda.

The judge worked 1453 days in the period and was assigned on average 75 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 9.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 630 – 633. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 4.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 60.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66.5%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 201
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 122

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 10.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.5%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4.1% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.8%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 795.1 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 623 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 397 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 63.7% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 94.1% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 4
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 3

The judge was mostly assigned to Commercial agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Commercial agenda.

The judge worked 1037 days in the period and was assigned on average 50 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 12 from 40 possible points and ranked on 689 – 691. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 4.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 7.5 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 56.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 64.9%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 152
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 86

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 11.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.8%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4.8% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 747 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 446 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 252 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 56.5% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 101.9% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 2 and delays prior to case assignment 2.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Obchodná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Obchodnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 627 days and on average was assigned 120 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 55,1% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 63,7%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 69
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 38

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 7,7% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 9,7%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 3,5%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,4%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 661 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 592 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 406 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 65,4% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 135,1% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 12,25 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 682 – 687. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 6 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 6,25 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – Seminár – 1
  • 2012 – Seminár – 1
  • 2011 – seminár – 1; 2012 – Seminár – 1; 2013 – Seminár – 1
  • 2011 – seminár – 1

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Opravné uznesenie
    Iná povaha rozhodnutia
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie – Obchodné spoločnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie – Obchodné spoločnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie – Obchodné spoločnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, PR zaplatenie 14 982,48 Eur s… Hearing will be held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, návrh na zaplatenie 831 302 Eur… Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, PR- zaplatenie 475,12 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o určenie právneho dôvodu a… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, O určenie neúčinnosti právneho… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o určenie právneho dôvodu a… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, -o určenie neúčinnosti právneho… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, -o určenie neúčinnosti právnych… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 1585 EUR s prísl. Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 379,8 EUR s prísl. Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 1208,55 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 21.546,- EUR s… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.