Overall evaluation of the judge is low.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from criminal agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from criminal agenda.
We register 59.52% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%.
We register 84 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.
The judge had overal appointment of cases of 102.65% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 215 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 194 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.
Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 207.158. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 113 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 69.03% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.
We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.
We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.
The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.
For the judge we register performance data for years 2013:
Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Trestná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Trestnej agende.
The judge in this period worked 161 days and on average was assigned 196 cases in 10 days in main agendas.
Evidujeme menej ako 10 odvolaní o rozhodnutiach sudcu, preto dáta považujeme za nereprezentatívne.
Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 168 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.
Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 102 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.
Sudca mal na konci roka 47 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 43,1% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.
Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 70,3% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.
Dáta o kvalite a efektivite sudcu nepovažujeme za dostatočné, preto sudcu bodovo nehodnotíme.
Notes about the data obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.
Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.