JUDr. Jana Raganová

  1. Active judicial council member at the court Správny súd Košice, we register 462 hearings and 384 judgements.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Krajský súd Košice, we register 392 hearings and no judgements.
  3. Inactive judge at the court Mestský súd Košice, we register 1,957 hearings and 1,706 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for about 13 years.

Close persons acknowledged in property declarations in years 2014, 2013, and 2012.

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2014:

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2013:

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2012:

Indicators for 2021

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 2
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 1

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 992 days in the period and was assigned on average 17 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 24.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 179 – 200. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 9 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 15.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 74.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 74
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 55

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 4.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.1% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 333.4 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 137 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 114 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 83.2% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 294.1% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 2
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 1

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 557 days in the period and was assigned on average 26 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 21 from 40 possible points and ranked on 390 – 416. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 6 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 15 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 62.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 24
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 15

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 2.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 0.8% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 294 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 438 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 117 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 26.7% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 94.6% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 1 and delays prior to case assignment 1.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 141 days and on average was assigned 426 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Evidujeme menej ako 10 odvolaní o rozhodnutiach sudcu, preto dáta považujeme za nereprezentatívne.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 546 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 423 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 162 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 36% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 47,1% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Dáta o kvalite a efektivite sudcu nepovažujeme za dostatočné, preto sudcu bodovo nehodnotíme.

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Žaloby proti právoplatným rozhodnutiam a…
    Zrušujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Žaloby proti právoplatným rozhodnutiam a…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie
    Iná povaha rozhodnutia
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Žaloby proti právoplatným rozhodnutiam a…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Žaloby proti právoplatným rozhodnutiam a…
    Zrušujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok – Žaloby proti právoplatným rozhodnutiam a…
    Iná povaha rozhodnutia
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie
    Odmietajúce podanie
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie
    Iná povaha rozhodnutia
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Žaloby proti právoplatným rozhodnutiam a…
    Iná povaha rozhodnutia
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, presk.roz.č.101559753/2022 zo… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Správny súd Košice
    Judge – JUDr. Jana Raganová
    Proposer – T. P.
    Opponent – F. L.
  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, pres.roz.č.100748205/2020 zo… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Správny súd Košice
    Judge – JUDr. Jana Raganová
    Proposers – M. J. and Q. A.
    Opponent – E. Y.
  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, preskúmanie rozhodnutia č.… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Správny súd Košice
    Judge – JUDr. Jana Raganová
    Proposer – V. K.
    Opponent – M. L.
  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, presk.rozh.č.102703093/2022… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Správny súd Košice
    Judge – JUDr. Jana Raganová
    Proposer – P. T.
    Opponent – O. S.
  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Správny súd Košice
    Judge – JUDr. Jana Raganová
    Proposer – N. S.
    Opponent – B. E.
  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, pres.roz.č.100835050/2023 zo… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Správny súd Košice
    Judge – JUDr. Jana Raganová
    Proposer – B. R.
    Opponent – C. A.
  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, preskúmanie rozhodnutia č.… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Správny súd Košice
    Judge – JUDr. Jana Raganová
    Proposer – A. U.
    Opponent – J. Y.
  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, preskúmanie rozhodnutia č… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Správny súd Košice
    Judge – JUDr. Jana Raganová
    Proposer – S. R.
    Opponents – D. G. and F. Q.
  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, preskúmanie rozhodnutia č.… Hearing will be held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, preskúmanie rozhodnutia č.… Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, preskúmanie rozhodnutia č… Hearing was held on

    Court – Správny súd Košice
    Judge – JUDr. Jana Raganová
    Proposer – N. O.
    Opponents – B. H. and W. D.
  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, preskúmanie rozhodnutia č.… Hearing was held on

    Court – Správny súd Košice
    Judge – JUDr. Jana Raganová
    Proposer – V. J.
    Opponent – U. R.
  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, preskúmanie rozhodnutia č.… Hearing was held on

    Court – Správny súd Košice
    Judge – JUDr. Jana Raganová
    Proposer – Y. O.
    Opponent – W. P.
  4. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, preskúmanie rozhodnutia č.… Hearing was held on

    Court – Správny súd Košice
    Judge – JUDr. Jana Raganová
    Proposer – S. K.
    Opponent – S. V.
  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, preskúmanie rozhodnutia č.… Hearing was held on

    Court – Správny súd Košice
    Judge – JUDr. Jana Raganová
    Proposer – X. Z.
    Opponent – P. T.
  6. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, invalidný dôchodok Hearing was held on

    Court – Správny súd Košice
    Judge – JUDr. Jana Raganová
    Proposer – P. F.
    Opponent – T. W.
  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, pres.roz.č.102329748/2018 zo… Hearing was held on

    Court – Správny súd Košice
    Judge – JUDr. Jana Raganová
    Proposer – M. B.
    Opponent – H. Y.
  8. Vyhlásenie rozsudku, pres.roz.č.OU-HE-PLO2-2022/007058-021… Hearing was held on

    Court – Správny súd Košice
    Judge – JUDr. Jana Raganová
    Proposers – O. J. and T. D.
    Opponent – Q. G.
  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, pres.roz.č.102313568/2018 zo… Hearing was held on

    Court – Správny súd Košice
    Judge – JUDr. Jana Raganová
    Proposer – H. P.
    Opponent – N. P.
  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, preskúmanie rozhodnutia č.… Hearing was held on

    Court – Správny súd Košice
    Judge – JUDr. Jana Raganová
    Proposer – E. Z.
    Opponent – A. V.
More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.