JUDr. Michal Kubiš

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Bratislava IV, we register 2,385 hearings and 1,808 judgements.
    Note: .
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for about 7 years.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 898 days in the period and was assigned on average 15 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 32.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 13 – 15. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 13.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 19 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 84.2% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 146
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 123

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 9.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.5% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 235.7 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 113 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 66 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 58.4% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 239.7% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 475 days in the period and was assigned on average 22 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 18 from 40 possible points and ranked on 525 – 541. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 10.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 7.5 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 75.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 73
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 55

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 7.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.9% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 428 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 498 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 101 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 20.3% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 66.1% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 43 days and on average was assigned 291 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Evidujeme menej ako 10 odvolaní o rozhodnutiach sudcu, preto dáta považujeme za nereprezentatívne.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 5882 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Informácie o nevybavených prípadoch považujeme za málo reprezentatívne a preto ich neprezentujeme.

Dáta o reštančných prípadoch považujeme za málo reprezentatívne a preto ich neprezentujeme.

Dáta o výkonnosti sudcu považujeme za málo reprezentatívne a preto ich neprezentujeme.

Dáta o kvalite a efektivite sudcu nepovažujeme za dostatočné, preto sudcu bodovo nehodnotíme.

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Poistenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, návrh na zaplatenie 883,69 € s… Hearing will be held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vydanie platobného rozkazu… Hearing will be held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, návrh na zaplatenie 1699,44 €… Hearing will be held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Návrh na vydanie platobného… Hearing will be held on

  5. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, návrh na zaplatenie 70,70 € s… Hearing will be held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, žaloba na náhradu škody Hearing will be held on

  7. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, návrh na zaplatenie 70,70 € s… Hearing will be held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, žaloba na zaplatenie 682,92 € s… Hearing will be held on

  9. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, návrh na zaplatenie 70,70 € s… Hearing will be held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, úprava výšky výživného Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o ochranu osobnosti Hearing was held on

  2. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, návrh na zaplatenie 70,70 € s… Hearing was held on

  3. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, návrh na zaplatenie 70,70 € s… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vypratanie družstevného bytu Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, návrh na zaplatenie 75.000,-… Hearing was held on

  6. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, návrh na zaplatenie 70,70 € s… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, úprava výšky výživného Hearing was held on

  8. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, návrh na zaplatenie 4300,- € s… Hearing was held on

  9. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, návrh na zaplatenie 70,70 € s… Hearing was held on

  10. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, návrh na zaplatenie 1881,76 €… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.