JUDr. Marián Dunčko

  1. Active judge at the court Krajský súd Trenčín, we register 1,229 hearings and 107 judgements.
    Note: .
  2. Inactive judge at the court Okresný súd Trnava, we register 1,546 hearings and 920 judgements.

Indicators for 2021

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in translation missing: en.judges.indicators_2015.basic.decided_agenda.trestná.

The judge worked 407 days in the period and was assigned on average 35 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 24.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 179 – 200. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 9 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 15.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 70.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 77
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 54

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 11.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.7%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3.4% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.9%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 112.2 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 123 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 63 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 51.2% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 114% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2013

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Život a zdravie
    Zmeňujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Sloboda a ľudská dôstojnosť
    Zmeňujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie – Sloboda a ľudská dôstojnosť
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie – Život a zdravie
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie – Život a zdravie
    Zmeňujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie – Sloboda a ľudská dôstojnosť
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie – Iné práva a slobody
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie – Sloboda a ľudská dôstojnosť
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie – Iné práva a slobody
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie – Iné práva a slobody
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, § 285 ods. 1, ods. 3… Hearing was held on

  2. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, § 221 ods. 1, 2, 3 písm.… Hearing was held on

  3. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, obzvlášť závažný zločin… Hearing was held on

  4. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, § 158 tr. zák. Hearing was held on

  5. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, prečin krádeže a iné Hearing was held on

  6. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, zločin vydierania Hearing was held on

  7. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, § 172 ods.1 písm. c/,d/… Hearing was held on

  8. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, Obžaloba Hearing was held on

  9. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, § 212 ods. 1 písm. a)… Hearing was held on

  10. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, prečin poškodzovanie… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.