Mgr. Michal Pollák

  1. Active judge at the court Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky, in the meantime we register no hearings and no judgements.
  2. Active judge at the court Krajský súd Trnava, we register 250 hearings and 175 judgements.
  3. Inactive judge at the court Okresný súd Trnava, we register 3,070 hearings and 1,077 judgements.

Indicators for 2021

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 1
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 1

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in translation missing: en.judges.indicators_2015.basic.decided_agenda.trestná.

The judge worked 414 days in the period and was assigned on average 35 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 24.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 179 – 200. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 13.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 11 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Additional Judges
Select other judges for comparison:
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 87.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 57
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 50

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 10.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.7%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.3% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.9%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 223.6 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 196 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 121 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 61.7% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 84.2% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2013

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie
    Potvrdzujúce     Judgement was issued on

    Court – Krajský súd Trnava
    Judge – Mgr. Michal Pollák

  2. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Zrušujúce     Judgement was issued on

    Court – Krajský súd Trnava
    Judge – Mgr. Michal Pollák

  3. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Zrušujúce     Judgement was issued on

    Court – Krajský súd Trnava
    Judge – Mgr. Michal Pollák

  4. Uznesenie
    Potvrdzujúce     Judgement was issued on

    Court – Krajský súd Trnava
    Judge – Mgr. Michal Pollák

  5. Uznesenie
    Zrušujúce     Judgement was issued on

    Court – Krajský súd Trnava
    Judge – Mgr. Michal Pollák

  6. Uznesenie Judgement was issued on

    Court – Krajský súd Trnava
    Judge – Mgr. Michal Pollák

  7. Uznesenie – Rodina a mládež
    Zrušujúce     Judgement was issued on

    Court – Krajský súd Trnava
    Judge – Mgr. Michal Pollák

  8. Uznesenie
    Potvrdzujúce     Judgement was issued on

    Court – Krajský súd Trnava
    Judge – Mgr. Michal Pollák

  9. Uznesenie – Majetok
    Zrušujúce     Judgement was issued on

    Court – Krajský súd Trnava
    Judge – Mgr. Michal Pollák

  10. Uznesenie
    Potvrdzujúce     Judgement was issued on

    Court – Krajský súd Trnava
    Judge – Mgr. Michal Pollák
More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, odvolanie proti… Hearing was held on

    Court – Krajský súd Trnava
    Judges – Mgr. Kristína Ferencziová, Mgr. Michal Pollák, and JUDr. Martin Žovinec
    Defendant – C. U.

  2. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, odvolanie proti… Hearing was held on

    Court – Krajský súd Trnava
    Judges – Mgr. Kristína Ferencziová, Mgr. Michal Pollák, and JUDr. Martin Žovinec
    Defendant – I. Q.

  3. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, odvolanie proti… Hearing was held on

    Court – Krajský súd Trnava
    Judges – Mgr. Kristína Ferencziová, Mgr. Michal Pollák, and JUDr. Martin Žovinec
    Defendant – P. J.

  4. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, odvolanie proti… Hearing was held on

    Court – Krajský súd Trnava
    Judges – Mgr. Kristína Ferencziová, Mgr. Michal Pollák, and JUDr. Martin Žovinec
    Defendant – T. M.

  5. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, odvolanie proti… Hearing was held on

    Court – Krajský súd Trnava
    Judges – Mgr. Kristína Ferencziová, Mgr. Michal Pollák, and JUDr. Martin Žovinec
    Defendant – E. O.

  6. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, odvolanie proti… Hearing was held on

    Court – Krajský súd Trnava
    Judges – Mgr. Kristína Ferencziová, Mgr. Michal Pollák, and JUDr. Martin Žovinec
    Defendant – T. J.

  7. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, odvolanie proti… Hearing was held on

    Court – Krajský súd Trnava
    Judges – Mgr. Kristína Ferencziová, Mgr. Michal Pollák, and JUDr. Martin Žovinec
    Defendant – P. Y.

  8. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, odvolanie proti… Hearing was held on

    Court – Krajský súd Trnava
    Judges – Mgr. Kristína Ferencziová, Mgr. Michal Pollák, and JUDr. Martin Žovinec
    Defendant – U. K.

  9. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, odvolanie proti… Hearing was held on

    Court – Krajský súd Trnava
    Judges – Mgr. Kristína Ferencziová, Mgr. Michal Pollák, and JUDr. Martin Žovinec
    Defendant – E. X.

  10. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, odvolanie proti… Hearing was held on

    Court – Krajský súd Trnava
    Judges – Mgr. Kristína Ferencziová, Mgr. Michal Pollák, and JUDr. Martin Žovinec
    Defendant – C. G.
More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.