JUDr. Martin Baločko

  1. Active judicial council member at the court Krajský súd Košice, we register 29 hearings and 60 judgements.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Mestský súd Košice, we register 2,535 hearings and 1,411 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for more than 18 years.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is excellent.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from criminal agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from criminal agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 75.39% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 256 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 107.19% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 58 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 328 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 243.873. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 49 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 57.14% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 1
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 1

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in translation missing: en.judges.indicators_2015.basic.decided_agenda.trestná.

The judge worked 1426 days in the period and was assigned on average 94 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 25.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 133 – 155. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 9 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 16.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 74.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 165
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 123

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 8.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.7%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.1% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.9%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 53.8 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 38 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 14 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 36.8% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 111.7% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 1
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 1

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Criminal agenda.

The judge worked 1000 days in the period and was assigned on average 72 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 28.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 91 – 106. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 9 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 19.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 70.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 63.8%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 102
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 72

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 6.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 85 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 58 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 24 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 41.4% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 106.9% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 1 and delays prior to case assignment 1.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Trestná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Trestnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 572 days and on average was assigned 128 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 60,9% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 52,3%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 46
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 28

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 6,1% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,4%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 2,4%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 4%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 95 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 42 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 25 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 52,1% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 101,3% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 26,75 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 101 – 109. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 9,5 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 17,25 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2012 – Sudcovi v sledovanom období (od 1. 1. 2012 do 30. 9. 2012) nebol znížený nápad.
  • 2012 – 1 deň – účasť na pracovnom stretnutí
  • 2011 – Sudcovi v sledovanom období nebol znížený nápad.; 2012 – Sudcovi v sledovanom období (od 1. 1. 2012 do 30. 9. 2012) nebol znížený nápad.
  • 2011 – Sudcovi v sledovanom období nebol znížený nápad.
  • 2011 – 3. – 4. 10. 2011 – Zasadnutie sudcov trestnoprávneho kolégia Krajského súdu v Banskej Bystrici a sudcov okresného súdu v obvode pôsobnosti krajského súdu vybavujúcu trestnoprávnu agendu, Inštitút vzdelávania MS SR v Omšení; 2012 – 1 deň – účasť na pracovnom stretnutí
  • 2011 – 3. – 4. 10. 2011 – Zasadnutie sudcov trestnoprávneho kolégia Krajského súdu v Banskej Bystrici a sudcov okresného súdu v obvode pôsobnosti krajského súdu vybavujúcu trestnoprávnu agendu, Inštitút vzdelávania MS SR v Omšení

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Sloboda a ľudská dôstojnosť
    Zmeňujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie – Iné práva a slobody
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie – Sloboda a ľudská dôstojnosť
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Iné práva a slobody
    Zmeňujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie – Majetok
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, 3Pv 162/12 - § 221 ods.… Hearing was held on

  2. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, 2Pv 346/20 - § 172 ods.… Hearing was held on

  3. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, 3Pv 225/20 - § 306 ods. 1… Hearing was held on

  4. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, 3Pv 525/18 - § 155… Hearing was held on

  5. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, 1Pv 446/19 - § 364… Hearing was held on

  6. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, 3Pv 428/19 - § 360 ods.… Hearing was held on

  7. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, 2 Pv 355/20 - § 251… Hearing was held on

  8. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, 3Pv 33/20 - § 219 ods. 1… Hearing was held on

  9. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, 4Pv 243/18 - § 207 ods.… Hearing was held on

  10. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, 2Pv 65/21 - § 157 ods.… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.