Mgr. Dušan Chamula

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Žilina, we register 1,914 hearings and 1,118 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for about 16 years.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 41
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 32

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1573 days in the period and was assigned on average 15 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 15 from 40 possible points and ranked on 566 – 574. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 4.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 10.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 59.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 226
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 134

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 9.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3.8% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 788.9 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 482 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 414 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 85.9% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 253.4% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 22
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 13

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1136 days in the period and was assigned on average 18 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 11.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 692 – 698. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 6 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 5.5 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 59.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 180
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 107

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 10.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4.1% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 616 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 905 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 492 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 54.4% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 92.7% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 14 and delays prior to case assignment 11.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 669 days and on average was assigned 158 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 54,2% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 120
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 65

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 13,1% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 6%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 599 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 574 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 389 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 64,7% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 98,9% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 8,5 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 721 – 724. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 3,5 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 5 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2012 – nebol znížený nápad
  • 2012 – nebol znížený nápad

Published judgements

  1. Opravné uznesenie
    Zmeňujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozhodnutie – Pracovné právo
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Zodpovednosť za škodu
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozhodnutie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozhodnutie – Zodpovednosť za škodu pri výkone…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozhodnutie – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o náhradu majetkovej škody a… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o náhradu majetkovej škody a… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o náhradu majetkovej škody a… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zaplatenie 12.000,- € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o náhradu majetkovej škody a… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o náhradu majetkovej škody a… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zapl. 6.055,56 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zapl. 915,29 € s prísl., z… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zaplatenie 607,56 € s prísl. z… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zapl. 62,93 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.