JUDr. Dana Káčerová

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Bratislava I, we register 3,000 hearings and 1,500 judgements.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 8
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 1

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1510 days in the period and was assigned on average 10 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 15 from 40 possible points and ranked on 566 – 574. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 10.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 4.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 75.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 319
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 241

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 19.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4.7% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 945.8 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 355 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 292 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 82.3% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 124.5% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 8
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 1

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1085 days in the period and was assigned on average 12 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 17.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 542 – 556. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 10.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 7 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 74.2% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 248
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 184

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 18.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4.9% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 573 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 491 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 288 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 58.7% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 96% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 2 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 651 days and on average was assigned 114 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 70% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 130
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 91

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 18,1% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 5,4%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 457 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 334 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 289 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 63,4% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 97,8% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 13,75 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 654 – 658. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 6,5 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 7,25 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – Seminár – 2 dni
  • 2012 – nezúčastnila sa ; 2013 – Seminár – 2 dni
  • 2012 – nezúčastnila sa

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozhodnutie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozhodnutie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozhodnutie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, návrh na určenie vlastníckeho… Hearing will be held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie neplatnosti… Hearing will be held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Predmet žaloby sa nachádza v… Hearing will be held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Žaloba o určenie relatívnej… Hearing will be held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie vlastníckeho práva +… Hearing will be held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zaplatenie 4869,84 EUR s… Hearing will be held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, na náhradu škody spôs.… Hearing will be held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, neplatnosť skončenia… Hearing will be held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 159300 EUR s… Hearing will be held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, žaloba na vydanie… Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, PR - zaplatenie 2995,80 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Podľa prílohy č. 1 - Žaloba s… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 552 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  4. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, PR zaplatenie 247,08 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  5. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, PR o zapl. 154,98 EUR s prísl. Hearing was held on

  6. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, PR zaplatenie 66,91 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  7. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, Žaloba o zaplatenie 286,59 EUR… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie neplatnosti… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie príslušenstva vo… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 2285,8 Eur s… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.