JUDr. Cecília Melišková

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Nové Zámky, we register 1,468 hearings and 1,061 judgements.

Close persons acknowledged in property declarations in years 2014, 2013, 2012, and 2011.

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2014:

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2013:

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2012:

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2011:

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in translation missing: en.judges.indicators_2015.basic.decided_agenda.trestná.

The judge worked 1506 days in the period and was assigned on average 121 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 25.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 133 – 155. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 9 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 16.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 72.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 269
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 195

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 9.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.7%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.7% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.9%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 72.4 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 74 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 27 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 36.5% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 107.2% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Criminal agenda.

The judge worked 1067 days in the period and was assigned on average 88 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 29.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 64 – 73. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 9 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 20.5 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 70.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 63.8%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 173
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 122

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 8.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.6% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 62 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 63 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 12 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 19% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 105.1% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Trestná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Trestnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 642 days and on average was assigned 127 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 60,9% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 52,3%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 69
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 42

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 7,7% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,4%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 3%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 4%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je –1 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených –1 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Dáta o reštančných prípadoch považujeme za málo reprezentatívne a preto ich neprezentujeme.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 108,6% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Dáta o kvalite a efektivite sudcu nepovažujeme za dostatočné, preto sudcu bodovo nehodnotíme.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2012 – 29. 3 – 30. 3. 2012 – Spoločné stretnutie sudcov v rámci obvodu KS Nitra – Omšenie
  • 2012 – 29. 3 – 30. 3. 2012 – Spoločné stretnutie sudcov v rámci obvodu KS Nitra – Omšenie

Published judgements

  1. Trestný rozkaz – Rodina a mládež
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Trestný rozkaz – Život a zdravie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Trestný rozkaz – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Trestný rozkaz – Poriadok vo verejných veciach
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Trestný rozkaz – Poriadok vo verejných veciach
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Opravné uznesenie – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Trestný rozkaz – Rodina a mládež
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Trestný rozkaz – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Trestný rozkaz Judgement was issued on

  10. Trestný rozkaz – Poriadok vo verejných veciach
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, § 217 odsek 1 Tr. zák. Hearing will be held on

    Hearing date is in far future, there is an error in original data.
    Court – Okresný súd Nové Zámky
    Judge – JUDr. Cecília Melišková
More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, § 158 Tr. zák. Hearing was held on

  2. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, § 289 odsek 2 Tr.zák. Hearing was held on

  3. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, Návrh na schválenie… Hearing was held on

  4. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, § 20 Tr. zák. k § 212… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, § 194 odsek 1,odsek 2 písmeno… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, § 360 odsek 1, odsek 2 písmeno… Hearing was held on

  7. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, § 208 odsek 1 písmen a… Hearing was held on

  8. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, § 360 odsek 1, odsek 2… Hearing was held on

  9. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, Návrh na schválenie… Hearing was held on

  10. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, zrušenie ochranného… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.