JUDr. Mária Petrušková

  1. Active vice chairman at the court Okresný súd Poprad, we register 2,147 hearings and 1,579 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for more than 20 years, bez časového obmedzenia funkcie.
  2. The judge has been nominated to function for more than 24 years, bez časového obmedzenia funkcie.

Close persons acknowledged in property declarations in years 2014.

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2014:

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in translation missing: en.judges.indicators_2015.basic.decided_agenda.trestná.

The judge worked 1528 days in the period and was assigned on average 104 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 19 from 40 possible points and ranked on 436 – 463. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 4.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 14.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 60.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 273
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 165

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 11.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.7%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4.5% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.9%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 93.1 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 77 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 39 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 50.6% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 97.7% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Criminal agenda.

The judge worked 1091 days in the period and was assigned on average 76 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 22 from 40 possible points and ranked on 345 – 366. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 6 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 16 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 59.2% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 63.8%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 179
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 106

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 10.2% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4.1% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 102 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 89 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 44 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 49.4% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 100% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Trestná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Trestnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 221 days and on average was assigned 86 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 53,8% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 52,3%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 13
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 7

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 5,8% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,4%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 2,7%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 4%.

Efficiency indicators

Pre sudcu evidujeme menej ako 20 rozhodnutí, preto jeho efektivitu nehodnotíme.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2011 – Jednodňový seminár – Aplikácia nových trestnoprávnych noriem v rozhodovacej činnosti, Stará Lesná, október 2011,
  • 2011 – Jednodňový seminár – Aplikácia nových trestnoprávnych noriem v rozhodovacej činnosti, Stará Lesná, október 2011,

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Trestný rozkaz – Poriadok vo verejných veciach
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti životnému…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Trestný rozkaz – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Trestný rozkaz – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Trestný rozkaz – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Život a zdravie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Život a zdravie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Trestný rozkaz – Život a zdravie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, zločin lúpeže podľa §… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Poprad
    Judge – JUDr. Mária Petrušková
    Defendant – E. H.
More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, prečin zanedbania… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Poprad
    Judge – JUDr. Mária Petrušková
    Defendant – H. R.
  2. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, Obžaloba Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Poprad
    Judge – JUDr. Mária Petrušková
    Defendant – H. J.
  3. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, prečin krádeže podľa §… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Poprad
    Judge – JUDr. Mária Petrušková
    Defendant – P. F.
  4. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, prečin § 207/1,3b)Tr.… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Poprad
    Judge – JUDr. Mária Petrušková
    Defendant – C. S.
  5. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, prečin úverového podvodu… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Poprad
    Judge – JUDr. Mária Petrušková
    Defendant – O. M.
  6. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zločin týrania blízkej… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Poprad
    Judge – JUDr. Mária Petrušková
    Defendant – I. E.
  7. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, prečin podvod podľa §… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Poprad
    Judge – JUDr. Mária Petrušková
    Defendant – Q. V.
  8. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, úverový podvod podľa §… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Poprad
    Judge – JUDr. Mária Petrušková
    Defendant – O. X.
  9. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, prečin nebezpeč.… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Poprad
    Judge – JUDr. Mária Petrušková
    Defendant – Q. F.
  10. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, prečin ohrozovania… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Poprad
    Judge – JUDr. Mária Petrušková
    Defendant – T. P.
More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.