JUDr. Vladimír Buchvald

  1. Active judge at the court Krajský súd Bratislava, we register 186 hearings and 1 judgement.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Okresný súd Bratislava II, we register 1,855 hearings and 587 judgements.

Close persons acknowledged in property declarations in years 2014, 2013, 2012, and 2011.

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2014:

  • JUDr. Glasová Miroslava Okresný Súd Bratislava Vyšší Súdny Úradník I, .

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2013:

  • JUDr. Glasová Miroslava Okresný Súd Bratislava Vyšší Súdny Úradník I, .

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2012:

  • JUDr. Miroslava Glasová, .

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2011:

  • JUDr. Miroslava Glasová, .

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in translation missing: en.judges.indicators_2015.basic.decided_agenda.trestná.

The judge worked 1634 days in the period and was assigned on average 162 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 20 from 40 possible points and ranked on 389 – 410. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 4.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 15.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 60.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 300
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 182

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 7.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.7%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.9% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.9%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 125.5 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 194 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 96 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 49.5% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 112.6% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Criminal agenda.

The judge worked 1168 days in the period and was assigned on average 109 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 24 from 40 possible points and ranked on 262 – 285. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 6 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 18 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 62.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 63.8%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 219
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 136

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 7.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 100 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 197 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 70 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 35.5% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 106.4% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Trestná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Trestnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 704 days and on average was assigned 115 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 51,7% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 52,3%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 60
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 31

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 6,3% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,4%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 3,1%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 4%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 78 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 78 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 46 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 46,9% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 114% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 26,75 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 101 – 109. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 8,5 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 18,25 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2012 – Sudca sa zúčastnil 2x porady so sudcami odvolacích senátov Krajskéhjo súdu v Bratislave a 1x spoločnej porady s prokurátormi ( súhrnný trest ).
  • 2012 – Sudca nemal znížený nápad.
  • 2011 – sudca sa nezúčastnil žiadnych vzdelávacích aktivít; 2012 – Sudca sa zúčastnil 2x porady so sudcami odvolacích senátov Krajskéhjo súdu v Bratislave a 1x spoločnej porady s prokurátormi ( súhrnný trest ).
  • 2011 – sudca sa nezúčastnil žiadnych vzdelávacích aktivít
  • 2011 – sudca nemá znížený nápad; 2012 – Sudca nemal znížený nápad.
  • 2011 – sudca nemá znížený nápad

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie – Poriadok vo verejných veciach
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Majetok
    Zastavujúce odvolacie konanie
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok – Rodina a mládež
    Potvrdené
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Trestný rozkaz – Život a zdravie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Trestný rozkaz – Poriadok vo verejných veciach
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Trestný rozkaz – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Trestný rozkaz – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Život a zdravie
    Zrušené
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Trestný rozkaz – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Trestný rozkaz – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, zločin podľa § 221 ods.… Hearing was held on

  2. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, Obžaloba Hearing was held on

  3. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, obžaloba Hearing was held on

  4. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, prečin § 212/1b, 2a, §… Hearing was held on

  5. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, odvolanie Hearing was held on

  6. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, §188/1,§188/2,§188/3 Hearing was held on

  7. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, §208/1a,b,3d Hearing was held on

  8. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, odvolanie Hearing was held on

  9. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, prečin podľa § 157 odsek… Hearing was held on

  10. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, prečin §212/1a,b; ods 2b Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.