JUDr. Jana Dubivská

  1. Active chairman at the court Okresný súd Bardejov, we register 1,736 hearings and 1,464 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for more than 28 years, bez časového obmedzenia funkcie.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is below average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from business agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from business agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 70.89% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 158 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 100.93% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 261 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 109 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 102.808. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 70 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 41.43% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 1
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 1

The judge was mostly assigned to Commercial agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Commercial agenda.

The judge worked 1462 days in the period and was assigned on average 76 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 19 from 40 possible points and ranked on 436 – 463. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 7.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 11.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 68.2% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66.5%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 110
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 75

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 6.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.5%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.8%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 263 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 147 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 50 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 34% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 91.9% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 1
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 1

The judge was mostly assigned to Commercial agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Commercial agenda.

The judge worked 1043 days in the period and was assigned on average 57 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 20 from 40 possible points and ranked on 444 – 466. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 7.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 12.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 67% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 64.9%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 88
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 59

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 6.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.8%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.1% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 327 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 218 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 96 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 44% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 96.8% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 1 and delays prior to case assignment 1.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Obchodná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Obchodnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 622 days and on average was assigned 89 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 69,8% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 63,7%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 43
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 30

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 5,9% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 9,7%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 1,8%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,4%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 246 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 150 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 88 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 44,9% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 124,6% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 25,5 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 143 – 153. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 9,75 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 15,75 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – Od 1.1.2013 do 31.12.2013 vykonávala funkciu podpredsedníčky okresného súdu
  • 2013 – 30.10.2013–31.10.2013–Celokrajský vzdelávací seminár orgnizovný Krajským súpdom v Prešove určený pre sudcov prešovského kraja, Stará Lesná ,19.11.–21.11.2013–Seminár "Príslušnosť súdu v sporoch s cezhraničným prvkom o určenie rozhodného práva"–Omšenie , 13.6.2013–14.6.2013 – Zabezpečovanie záväzkov, záložné právo, zabezpečovacie prevody práva
  • 2012 – od 1.1.2012 – 31.12.2012 vykonávala funkciu podpredsedníčky okresného súdu
  • 2012 – 22.11. – 23.11.2012 – pracovné stretnutie sudcov Štrbské pleso–PATRIA
  • 2011 – § 50 ods. 3 zák.č. 757/2004 Z.z.; 2012 – od 1.1.2012 – 31.12.2012 vykonávala funkciu podpredsedníčky okresného súdu; 2013 – Od 1.1.2013 do 31.12.2013 vykonávala funkciu podpredsedníčky okresného súdu
  • 2011 – § 50 ods. 3 zák.č. 757/2004 Z.z.
  • 2011 – Projekt "Posilnenie uplatňovania schengenského acquis a práva európskej únie justičnými orgánmi Slovenskej republiky" – ESĽP v Štrasburgu a ESD v Luxemburgu – 3 dni,Práv. styk s cudzinou v kontexgte komunit.nariadení o doruč.súdnych a mimosúd.písomností,Omšenie–2dni, Aktuálna rozhod.činnosť SD EÚ–Aplikácia práva EÚ podľa Lisab.zmluvy,Omšenie–1 deň,Právomoc,uznávanie a výkon súd.rozh.v čl. štát. EÚ,Omšenie–2dni, Spoločné kolíégium občianskoprávne a obchodné, KS Prešov–1deň ; 2012 – 22.11. – 23.11.2012 – pracovné stretnutie sudcov Štrbské pleso–PATRIA; 2013 – 30.10.2013–31.10.2013–Celokrajský vzdelávací seminár orgnizovný Krajským súpdom v Prešove určený pre sudcov prešovského kraja, Stará Lesná ,19.11.–21.11.2013–Seminár "Príslušnosť súdu v sporoch s cezhraničným prvkom o určenie rozhodného práva"–Omšenie , 13.6.2013–14.6.2013 – Zabezpečovanie záväzkov, záložné právo, zabezpečovacie prevody práva
  • 2011 – Projekt "Posilnenie uplatňovania schengenského acquis a práva európskej únie justičnými orgánmi Slovenskej republiky" – ESĽP v Štrasburgu a ESD v Luxemburgu – 3 dni,Práv. styk s cudzinou v kontexgte komunit.nariadení o doruč.súdnych a mimosúd.písomností,Omšenie–2dni, Aktuálna rozhod.činnosť SD EÚ–Aplikácia práva EÚ podľa Lisab.zmluvy,Omšenie–1 deň,Právomoc,uznávanie a výkon súd.rozh.v čl. štát. EÚ,Omšenie–2dni, Spoločné kolíégium občianskoprávne a obchodné, KS Prešov–1deň

Published judgements

  1. Trestný rozkaz – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Trestný rozkaz – Život a zdravie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Trestný rozkaz – Život a zdravie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Zmluva o dielo
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Trestný rozkaz – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Trestný rozkaz – Život a zdravie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Trestný rozkaz – Život a zdravie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie – Zmluva o dielo
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie – Kúpna zmluva
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie – Kúpna zmluva
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 4500,25 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 28000 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 23000 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  4. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, Obžaloba Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 1902,58 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 10967,85 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  7. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, Obžaloba Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Bardejov
    Judge – JUDr. Jana Dubivská
    Defendant – A. S.
  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 18664,08 Eur Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 28000 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, na rozvod manželstva Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.