JUDr. Ingrid Kišacová, PhD.

  1. Active judge at the court Krajský súd Nitra, we register 405 hearings and 49 judgements.
    Note: .
  2. Inactive chairman at the court Okresný súd Topoľčany, we register 700 hearings and 246 judgements.

Indicators for 2021

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in translation missing: en.judges.indicators_2015.basic.decided_agenda.trestná.

The judge worked 763 days in the period and was assigned on average 22 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 30.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 22 – 27. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 13.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 17 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 86.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 75
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 65

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 19.2% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.7%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.6% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.9%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 68.3 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 26 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 3 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 11.5% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 90.3% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2013

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie – Poriadok vo verejných veciach
    Zrušujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Poriadok vo verejných veciach
    Zmeňujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie – Majetok
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie – Majetok
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie – Poriadok vo verejných veciach
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie – Majetok
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie – Majetok
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti životnému…
    Zmeňujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie – Život a zdravie
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie – Poriadok vo verejných veciach
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, odvolanie obžalovaného Hearing was held on

  2. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, odvolanie OP Hearing was held on

  3. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, odvolanie OP Hearing was held on

  4. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, odvolanie obžalovaného Hearing was held on

  5. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, odvolanie OP Hearing was held on

  6. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, odvolanie obžalovaného Hearing was held on

  7. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, odvolanie obžal. a OP Hearing was held on

  8. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, odvolanie obžalovaného Hearing was held on

  9. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, odvolanie obžalovaného Hearing was held on

  10. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, odvolanie obžalovaného Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.