Mgr. Miriam Kamenská

  1. Active judge at the court Krajský súd Banská Bystrica, we register 329 hearings and 101 judgements.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Okresný súd Banská Bystrica, we register 2,310 hearings and 1,807 judgements.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2021

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Commercial agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Commercial agenda.

The judge worked 1461 days in the period and was assigned on average 96 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 28.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 49 – 61. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 15 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 13.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 88.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66.5%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 116
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 103

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 5.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.5%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 0.6% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.8%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 288.8 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 216 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 78 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 36.1% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 120.8% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Commercial agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Commercial agenda.

The judge worked 1050 days in the period and was assigned on average 72 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 28 from 40 possible points and ranked on 107 – 118. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 13.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 14.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 86.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 64.9%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 76
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 66

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 5.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.8%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 0.7% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 283 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 355 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 72 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 20.3% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 87.7% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Obchodná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Obchodnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 643 days and on average was assigned 121 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 75% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 63,7%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 40
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 30

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 5,1% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 9,7%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 1,3%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,4%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 216 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 166 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 56 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 32,2% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 97,9% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 28,25 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 65 – 68. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 11,5 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 16,75 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – Pracovné stretnutie sudcov obvodu Krajského súdu v Banskej Bystrici,25.–26.04.2013,IMS Omšenie, Spoločné rokovanie občianskoprávneho a správneho kolégia Krajského súdu v Banskej Bystrici spojené s poradou so sudcami okresných súdov v obvode pôsobnosti krajského súdu vybavujúcimi občianskoprávnu a správnu agendu,17.–18.10.2013,IMS Omšenie
  • 2012 – Obchodno–právne kolégium KS v BB a okresných súdov v obvode, 17.–18.9.2012, Omšenie
  • 2011 – Sudkyňa v roku 2011 vybavovala 90% senátneho nápadu vzhľadom na vybavovanie aj ďalšej agendy Cbi v rozsahu 10% súdneho nápadu.
  • 2011 – Sudkyňa v roku 2011 vybavovala 90% senátneho nápadu vzhľadom na vybavovanie aj ďalšej agendy Cbi v rozsahu 10% súdneho nápadu.
  • 2011 – 15.03.2011 – Aplikačné problémy O.s.p., ÚPV B. Bystrica; 2012 – Obchodno–právne kolégium KS v BB a okresných súdov v obvode, 17.–18.9.2012, Omšenie; 2013 – Pracovné stretnutie sudcov obvodu Krajského súdu v Banskej Bystrici,25.–26.04.2013,IMS Omšenie, Spoločné rokovanie občianskoprávneho a správneho kolégia Krajského súdu v Banskej Bystrici spojené s poradou so sudcami okresných súdov v obvode pôsobnosti krajského súdu vybavujúcimi občianskoprávnu a správnu agendu,17.–18.10.2013,IMS Omšenie
  • 2011 – 15.03.2011 – Aplikačné problémy O.s.p., ÚPV B. Bystrica

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Náhrada škody
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie – Konkurz
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie – Konkurz
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie
    Odmietajúce odvolanie
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Pripúštajúce spätvzatie návrhu, zrušujúce rozsudok a…
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Iná povaha rozhodnutia
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie – Konkurz
    Zrušujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie – Oddĺženie
    Pripúštajúce spätvzatie návrhu, zrušujúce rozsudok a…
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o vyhlásenie konkurzu Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, vyhlásenie konkurzu Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, vyhlásenie konkurzu Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, vyhlásenie konkurzu Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, vyhlásenie konkurzu Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, na vyhlásenie konkurzu Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, vylúčenie vecí z konkurznej… Hearing was held on

  8. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 7880 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  9. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 3 653,36 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  10. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zdržanie sa nekalosúťažného… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.