JUDr. Anna Kašajová

  1. Active judge at the court Krajský súd Bratislava, we register 173 hearings and no judgements.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Okresný súd Bratislava I, we register 1,254 hearings and 740 judgements.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2017

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 5
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 2

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 993 days in the period and was assigned on average 11 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 15.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 601 – 622. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 9 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 6.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 72.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 43
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 31

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 5.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.6% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 597 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 520 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 297 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 57.1% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 97.5% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 2 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 623 days and on average was assigned 70 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 84,2% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 19
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 16

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 7,8% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 1,2%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 1404 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 250 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 149 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 57,3% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 22,4% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 17,25 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 556 – 573. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 12,5 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 4,75 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – Seminár – 1 deň
  • 2012 – Semináre – 13 dní; 2013 – Seminár – 1 deň
  • 2012 – Semináre – 13 dní
  • 2011 – § 35 ods. 3 zák. č. 757/2004 Z.z.
  • 2011 – § 35 ods. 3 zák. č. 757/2004 Z.z.

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie – Nájomná zmluva
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok – Zmluva o dielo
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Iná povaha rozhodnutia
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozhodnutie – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Bezpodielové spoluvlastníctvo manželov
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Past hearings

  1. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, určenie neplatnosti právneho… Hearing was held on

  2. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, PR - 230,17 € Hearing was held on

  3. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zaplatenie 19.635,04 eur s… Hearing was held on

  4. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, určenie, že nehnuteľnosti… Hearing was held on

  5. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zaplatenie 15 083,35 € s… Hearing was held on

  6. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zaplatenie 1.299.000,- Sk s… Hearing was held on

  7. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, Žaloba o zaplatenie 5.000 EUR… Hearing was held on

  8. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, PR 1.555,92 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  9. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 128,44 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  10. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zaplatenie 127 018,- € s… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.