Mgr. Daniel Koneracký

  1. Active vice chairman at the court Okresný súd Levice, we register 1,190 hearings and 979 judgements.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Okresný súd Žiar nad Hronom, we register 1,472 hearings and 1,403 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for almost 11 years.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is above average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 68.86% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 167 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 142.45% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 334 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 151 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 151. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 130 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 29.23% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 985 days in the period and was assigned on average 60 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 15.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 561 – 565. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 7.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 8 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 69.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 116
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 81

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 6.2% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.9% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 333.2 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 136 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 84 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 61.8% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 60.3% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge did not issue judgements in any agenda dominantly..

The judge worked 613 days in the period and was assigned on average 43 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 21 from 40 possible points and ranked on 390 – 416. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 10.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 10.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 77.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66.3%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 72
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 56

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 6.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.8%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.5% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.9%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 354 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 540 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 82 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 15.2% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 69.6% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2013:

Sudcovi nebola žiadna agenda prideľovaná dominantne. Sudca nerozhodoval v žiadnej agende väčšinovo.

The judge in this period worked 152 days and on average was assigned 148 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Evidujeme menej ako 10 odvolaní o rozhodnutiach sudcu, preto dáta považujeme za nereprezentatívne.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 232 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 101 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 4 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 3,5% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 70,7% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Dáta o kvalite a efektivite sudcu nepovažujeme za dostatočné, preto sudcu bodovo nehodnotíme.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – Sudca sa nezúčastnil žiadneho vzdelávacieho seminára.
  • 2013 – Sudca sa nezúčastnil žiadneho vzdelávacieho seminára.

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozhodnutie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozhodnutie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozhodnutie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozhodnutie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zrušenie a vyporiadanie… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie neplatnosti závetu… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 2939,64 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 165,82 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, uloženie povinnosti uzatvoriť… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Žaloba o vyporiadanie… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 20704,21 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zrušenie podielového… Hearing was held on

  9. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 487,98 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zrušenie a vyporiadanie… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.