Mgr. Jana Koščová

  1. Active judge at the court Mestský súd Košice, we register 507 hearings and 3,226 judgements.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Okresný súd Košice II, we register 3,101 hearings and no judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for more than 25 years, bez časového obmedzenia funkcie.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is above average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 60.82% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 485 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 130.77% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 279 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 442 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 442. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 345 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 42.32% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 2
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1455 days in the period and was assigned on average 44 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 26 from 40 possible points and ranked on 113 – 132. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 6 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 20 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 61.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 357
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 220

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 11.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4.3% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 163.6 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 121 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 71 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 58.7% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 360% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 2
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1055 days in the period and was assigned on average 43 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 25 from 40 possible points and ranked on 214 – 237. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 6 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 19 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 61% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 264
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 161

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 11.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4.7% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 177 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 407 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 59 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 14.5% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 103.8% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 1 690 Eur s prísl.… Hearing will be held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vyporiadanie bezpodielového… Hearing will be held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zrušenie a vyporiadanie… Hearing will be held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, náhradu škody Hearing will be held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 159.543,13 Eur s prísl. Hearing will be held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o uloženie povinností zdržať… Hearing will be held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie vlastníckeho práva Hearing will be held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 24 641,37 € s prísl. Hearing will be held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 2.155 Eur s prísl. Hearing will be held on

  10. Predbežné prejednanie sporu, 2.155 Eur s prísl. Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Žaloba o zaplatenie 10.000,-… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 1 376 Eur s prísl. Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zriadenie vecného bremena -… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zrušenie a vyporiadanie… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie neplatnosti… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Žaloba o vydanie bezdôvodného… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Neúčinnosť právneho úkonu -… Hearing was held on

  8. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, 58,81 Eur s prísl. Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, náhradu škody Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, O zrušenie podielového… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.