JUDr. Miroslav Krištofík

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Galanta, we register 1,907 hearings and 2,421 judgements.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2017

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Family Agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Family Agenda.

The judge worked 969 days in the period and was assigned on average 93 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 13 from 40 possible points and ranked on 668 – 676. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 0 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 13 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 37% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.3%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 146
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 54

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 8.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 7.6%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 5.4% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.5%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 291 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 292 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 103 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 35.3% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 90.1% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä agenda Starostlivosti o maloletých. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v agende Starostlivosti o maloletých.

The judge in this period worked 559 days and on average was assigned 180 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 32,5% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 65,5%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 80
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 26

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 7,9% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 7,2%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 5,4%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 2,5%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 215 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 166 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 74 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 35,7% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 94,3% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 16,5 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 585 – 594. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 1,25 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 15,25 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – 06.06.2013 – 07.06.2013 – celokrajské stretnutie sudcov
  • 2011 – 6.4. – 7.4.2011 – Špecifiká rozhodovania v otázkach detí a rodiny; 2013 – 06.06.2013 – 07.06.2013 – celokrajské stretnutie sudcov
  • 2011 – 6.4. – 7.4.2011 – Špecifiká rozhodovania v otázkach detí a rodiny

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie
    Zmenené
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozsudok – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Opravné uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Vyživovacie povinnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Ústavná starostlivosť Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Návrh na určenie výživného a… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Návrh na zníženie výživného Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Návrh na zvýšenie výživného Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Nácvrh na obmedzenie… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Návrh na zvýšenie výživného Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Návrh na zvýšenie výživného Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Návrh na rozvod a úpp Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, ÚPP Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Návrh na vyslovenie… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Návrh na výživné Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.