Mgr. Božena Csibrányiová

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Nové Zámky, we register 2,765 hearings and 1,743 judgements.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Okresný súd Nitra, we register 2 hearings and 115 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for almost 22 years.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is excellent.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 81.08% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 222 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 101.89% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 258 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 323 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 322.568. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 204 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 30.39% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 712 days in the period and was assigned on average 18 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 29 from 40 possible points and ranked on 41 – 48. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 12 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 17 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 80% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 130
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 104

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 10.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.1% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 217.7 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 195 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 117 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 60% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 201.9% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Obchodná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Obchodnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 223 days and on average was assigned 65 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 76,5% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 63,7%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 17
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 13

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 8,9% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 9,7%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 2,1%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,4%.

Efficiency indicators

Pre sudcu evidujeme menej ako 20 rozhodnutí, preto jeho efektivitu nehodnotíme.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2011 – Sudca sa nezúčastnil žiadnych vzdelávacích aktivít.
  • 2011 – Sudca sa nezúčastnil žiadnych vzdelávacích aktivít.
  • 2011 – Nebol dôvod na zníženie nápadu.
  • 2011 – Nebol dôvod na zníženie nápadu.

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie – Bezdôvodné obohatenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok – Bezpodielové spoluvlastníctvo manželov
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozsudok – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Vyživovacie povinnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, žaloba o zrušenie a… Hearing will be held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 421,52 Eur s… Hearing will be held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Žaloba o vydanie bezdôvodného… Hearing will be held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 24000 Eur s… Hearing will be held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 421,52 Eur s… Hearing will be held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Žaloba o bezdôvodné… Hearing will be held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vrátenie peňazí za kúpené… Hearing will be held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 1992,46 Eur s… Hearing will be held on

  9. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 5487,2 Eur s… Hearing will be held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zaplatenie 12.000,- Eur s… Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie vlastníckeho práva… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 35,56 eur s… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 551,23 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o určenie neplatnosti vydedenia Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 101,9 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vypratanie nehnuteľnosti Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zaplatenie 303,14 Eur s prísl. Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, vyslovenie neplatnosti právneho… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 1068,44 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zrušenie a vysporiadanie… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.