JUDr. Katarína Bartalská

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Bratislava I, we register 2,596 hearings and 1,576 judgements.
    Note: .
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for more than 7 years.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 3
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 1

The judge was mostly assigned to Commercial agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Commercial agenda.

The judge worked 981 days in the period and was assigned on average 63 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 19.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 411 – 435. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 9 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 10.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 70.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66.5%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 96
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 68

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 7.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.5%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.3% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.8%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 458.2 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 418 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 237 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 56.7% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 138.8% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Commercial agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Commercial agenda.

The judge worked 560 days in the period and was assigned on average 41 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 16.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 576 – 590. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 6 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 10.5 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 58.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 64.9%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 34
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 20

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 5.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.8%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.4% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 339 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 337 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 185 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 54.9% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 92.8% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Obchodná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Obchodnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 140 days and on average was assigned 16 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Evidujeme menej ako 10 odvolaní o rozhodnutiach sudcu, preto dáta považujeme za nereprezentatívne.

Efficiency indicators

Pre sudcu evidujeme menej ako 20 rozhodnutí, preto jeho efektivitu nehodnotíme.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – Seminár –1
  • 2013 – Seminár –1

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok – Incidenčné spory
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Incidenčné spory
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Incidenčné spory
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Incidenčné spory
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie – Konkurz
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie – Konkurz
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vyslovenie neúčinnosti… Hearing was held on

  2. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 11 870,46 € s… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, určenie pravosti pohľadávky Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o neúčinnosť právnych úkonov a… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o určenie neúčinnosti… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 3.450.000 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o určenie neúčinnosti právneho… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie neúčinnosti právneho… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, určenie neúčinnosti právneho… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, O určenie neúčinnosti právneho… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.