Close persons acknowledged in property declarations in years 2014.
Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2014:
Notes about the data obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.
We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.
Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:
The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.
The judge worked 1030 days in the period and was assigned on average 40 cases per 100 days in main agendas.
In 2015, the judge received in total 4.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 736 – 737. place of 738 evaluated judges.
The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 48.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.
The judge had 2441 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.
In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 23.9% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.
The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 1 and delays prior to case assignment 0.
For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:
The judge in this period worked 620 days and on average was assigned 234 cases in 10 days in main agendas.
Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 53,3% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.
Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 1053 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.
Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 48,6% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.
Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 15 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 631 – 635. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 5 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 10 z 25.
Notes about the data obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.
Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.